<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Great movie except for one scene.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Sand Pebbles</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>qormi</strong> — <em>11 years ago(May 27, 2014 12:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That scene in the bar / brothel. When the little Chinese guy ultimately beats Simon Oakland's character. It was such a phony, cavernous, brightly lit sound stage. What were they thinking? Imagine how much more effective a dimly lit,claustrophobic setting would have been.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181806/great-movie-except-for-one-scene</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:06:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181806.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:37:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Great movie except for one scene. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:37:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Etherdave</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 18, 2014 09:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The bar is lit exactly as it is lit throughout the film. If it seems too bright, consider this: if YOU were Mama Chunk, and you had a bar full of native AND foreign riff-raff, several pimps, AND a bunch of rowdy, drunk sailors, would YOU want a dimly-lit environment in which a scenario such as this were played out? I think not.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1526643</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1526643</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:37:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Great movie except for one scene. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:37:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rready4198-693-489748</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 10, 2014 09:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That may be true but they were more than likely thinking about the bottom line.  In 1966 Studios were not giving up a lot of money for pictures. This one was already behind schedule so a sound stage was the best they could more than likely do. I could be wrong but knowing how the "heads" thoughtbottom line was probably the main culprit.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1526642</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1526642</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:37:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>