<![CDATA[Why on the national film registry?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Seconds

LetThemEatCake01 — 9 years ago(December 10, 2016 08:48 PM)

There is literally nothing memorable about this.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181854/why-on-the-national-film-registryRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 02:59:05 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 11:45:04 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Why on the national film registry? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:45:06 GMT]]>LetThemEatCake01 — 9 years ago(December 11, 2016 06:14 PM)

I just thought it was so boring and unremarkable, don't see why it would be there.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1527152https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1527152Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:45:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why on the national film registry? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:45:05 GMT]]>ncdwbmk6 — 9 years ago(December 11, 2016 05:45 PM)

The film was imaginative and thought-provoking. There are a lot of worse films in the registry.
Fowler's knots? Did you say fowler's knots?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1527151https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1527151Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:45:05 GMT