<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Planet of the Apes</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>SamoanJoes</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 06, 2015 09:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I ABSOLUTELY DESPISE when I haven't seen a film and someone spoils the ending for you and say: "oh, it's been out for (x) amount of years so it's your own fault". It's as if they want to show off that they saw the film and you didn't.<br />
I saw this film for the first time today and was bothered that I knew the twist ending because of people who spoiled it for me. If you love the film so much, why not just shut up and allow someone who hasn't seen the film before enjoy it as much as you did?<br />
It actually bothered me the entire time watching this film so I couldn't have an honest opinion on whether or not I saw the twist coming.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/182548/this-is-a-prime-example-of-why-i-hate-pretentious-film-buffs</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 08:26:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/182548.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JamesA-1102</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 11, 2016 07:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">even the cover of the DVD has given away the ending for a decade or more that I know of.<br />
Only one release of the DVD in 2001 had a cover that gave away the ending. All subsequent releases in 2003 (<br />
<a href="http://www.potamediaarchive.com/images/HVcovers/DVD_Planet-1968b.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.potamediaarchive.com/images/HVcovers/DVD_Planet-1968b.jpg</a><br />
), 2006 (<br />
<a href="http://www.potamediaarchive.com/images/HVcovers/DVD_Planet-1968c.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.potamediaarchive.com/images/HVcovers/DVD_Planet-1968c.jpg</a><br />
) and 2008 (<br />
<a href="http://www.potamediaarchive.com/images/HVcovers/bluray_planet.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.potamediaarchive.com/images/HVcovers/bluray_planet.jpg</a><br />
) had different covers.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532511</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532511</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>laplante-co-672-297856</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 10, 2016 04:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Did you just return from deep space on a mission of your own or what?<br />
This movie has been part of pop culture for over forty years. The ending has been mentioned and spoofed over and over again even the cover of the DVD has given away the ending for a decade or more that I know of.<br />
Weird</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532510</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532510</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Fletcherj119</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 31, 2016 02:32 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I didn't see Burton's 2001 film in theaters, so I went out of my way to avoid reviews or any kind of spoilers so I could see it unbiased when the disc was released. But I did hear that it had a twist ending.<br />
When I finally watched the movie, as soon as Wahlberg launched the ship toward the end, I knew what was going to happen, having read the original novel.<br />
That movie doesn't bother me as much as it does some people; it's inferior, of course, to the original movie series, but I didn't think it was that bad for what it was.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532509</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532509</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jsm-33292</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 30, 2016 03:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was annoyed when apprised of the twist too, but sober reasoning calmed my agitation.<br />
I mean reasoning such as this:<br />
(1) A twist ending is ephemeral. You are only surprised once. Since the high quality aspects of a film can be enjoyed repeatedly, any elements that give enjoyment only once don't qualify as high quality. So you're not losing out on much.<br />
(2) I've often felt that knowing a twist ending before I first watch it can be more satisfying than being surprised. That's because my brain can concentrate on the meaning of the ending rather than being distracted by surprise. And the more meaningful the ending is, the less important its 'surprise' element is.<br />
(3) Knowing there's a twist ending to a film, without knowing what the twist actually is, can raise expectations too high. You may well then find the ending anti-climactic.<br />
(4) As mentioned by someone earlier in the thread, plot belongs on the lowest tier of a film's attributes. And surprise belongs on the lowest tier of a plot's attributes. Clarity, credibility, economy, and balance are all more important aspects of a plot than surprise (which is really just decorative frippery).</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532508</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532508</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JamesA-1102</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 18, 2016 06:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes that was a stupid cover from the 2001 DVD release. Thankfully, they didn't use it for the 2 subsequent DVD releases or the 2008 Blu-Ray release.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532507</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532507</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>svenrufus</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 17, 2016 05:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Depending on how you saw the film, the spoiler might have come from the film makers themselves! Check out the cover to some home media launch.<br />
<a href="http://fontmeme.com/planets-of-the-apes-font/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://fontmeme.com/planets-of-the-apes-font/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532506</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532506</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DryToast</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 14, 2015 11:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I usually don't mind plot spoilers because I don't think plot is the most important element of a movie, and it's only an inferior movie that depends on the surprise of a plot twist for its primary value.  If the movie is any good in the first place, the twist should still be satisfying.<br />
To use the example of a slightly more recent movie, "I'll have what she's having" should still be funny when finally seeing it in context in<br />
When Harry Met Sally<br />
even after seeing the out-of-context clip a hundred times.<br />
As Dr. Gregory House once said, "If the wonder is gone when the truth is known, there never was any wonder."<br />
Also, you're talking about<br />
Planet of the Apes<br />
here.  This is not just some obscure murder mystery from the 1930s, this is an iconic classic that had a huge impact on the culture of its day (including the young up-and-coming generation) and entered the world's consciousness as few movies do, in a way that makes it impossible to hide from its plot twist over forty years later.<br />
This is like someone being annoyed that he knows about Adam and Eve and the apple before reading Genesis for himself.<br />
I don't know if it's "really wacky," but your French is coming along.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532505</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532505</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Synergetic11</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 06, 2015 09:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The DVD and Bluray menus themselves have a Statue of Liberty buried in the sand design as part of the rotating images that come up. So, straight up, they're already spoiling it for anyone who watches this for the first time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532504</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532504</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SamoanJoes</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 04, 2015 05:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And yet you think I need medication for that, so you're being melodramatic as well.<br />
If I used "dislike" instead, would that please you?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532503</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532503</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>!!!deleted!!! (19664510)</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 03, 2015 08:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You think I need medication because I hate when people spoil a movie for me,<br />
No. That's not what I said. You're melodramatic because you're using the word "hate" to describe film buffs.<br />
I don't read or respond to private messages. Sorry.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532502</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532502</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SamoanJoes</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 03, 2015 06:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You think I need medication because I hate when people spoil a movie for me, and you somehow think<br />
I'm<br />
the one that's being melodramatic? I even refrained from name calling, too.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532501</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532501</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>!!!deleted!!! (19664510)</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 02, 2015 10:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs.<br />
Then you're a needlessly melodramatic twat who requires a copious dose of medication.<br />
I don't read or respond to private messages. Sorry.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532500</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532500</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>georgijeg1</strong> — <em>10 years ago(June 14, 2015 04:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The apes speaking English and being able to read Latin letters kind of gave it away</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532499</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532499</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SamoanJoes</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 28, 2015 03:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Says the guy whose username is "KirkCameronsFailedCareer".</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532498</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532498</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:10:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532497</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532497</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prismark10</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 25, 2015 12:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">12 years as a slave.<br />
I wonder if he was a slave for 12 years!<br />
Its that man again!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532496</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532496</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wears-alan</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 25, 2015 10:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Death of a Salesman - he dies.<br />
It wasnt me, it was the other three. Hang them!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532495</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532495</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JamesA1102</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 25, 2015 06:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Spoilers! <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":-)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532494</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532494</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Fletcherj119</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 24, 2015 11:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And Close Encounters had an alien ship land.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532493</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532493</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prismark10</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 24, 2015 06:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">'Any James Bond movie - 007 saves the world, kills the bad guy and gets the girl.'<br />
Actually in Skyfall the villain wanted to kill M and die himself which actually.<br />
Its that man again!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532492</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532492</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wears-alan</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 21, 2015 08:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Titanic - The ship sinks.<br />
It wasnt me, it was the other three. Hang them!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532491</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532491</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JamesA1102</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 21, 2015 08:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You forgot a few:<br />
Patton</p>
<ul>
<li>The Allies defeat the Nazis.<br />
All the President's Men</li>
<li>Nixon Resigns.<br />
Apollo 13</li>
<li>The crew makes it safely back to Earth.<br />
Recount</li>
<li>The Supreme Court stops the recount and declares George W. Bush the winner.<br />
Zero Dark Thirty</li>
<li>They kill Osama bin Laden.<br />
Any James Bond movie</li>
<li>007 saves the world, kills the bad guy and gets the girl.</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532490</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532490</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>savagebiscuits</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 23, 2015 07:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You Maniacs! You spoiled it! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532489</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532489</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This is a prime example of why I hate pretentious film buffs. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JamesA1102</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 23, 2015 05:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just an FYI guys, here is the trailer to the sequel:<br />
The final shot of the first film is included in the first 20 seconds. The producers and studio spoiled the ending less than 2 years later.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532488</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1532488</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:09:51 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>