<![CDATA[After watching this film (for which I was aware Ruth Gordon received a well-deserved Oscar win for Best Supporting Actre]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Rosemary's Baby

dbone828 — 9 years ago(November 20, 2016 04:34 PM)

After watching this film (for which I was aware Ruth Gordon received a well-deserved Oscar win for Best Supporting Actress), I was expecting to see
The Exorcist
-like numbers for nominations, but was surprised that
Rosemary's Baby
only received one other nomination (albeit, in the respectable Adapted Screenplay category).
The lack of nominations for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actress seem like very obvious snubs, and other nominations would have been more than welcome (Best Supporting Actor [Blackmer] and Best Original Score, to name a few).

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/182697/after-watching-this-film-for-which-i-was-aware-ruth-gordon-received-a-well-deserved-oscar-win-for-best-supporting-actreRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 04:23:28 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 13:39:31 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to After watching this film (for which I was aware Ruth Gordon received a well-deserved Oscar win for Best Supporting Actre on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:39:32 GMT]]>americanadian25 — 9 years ago(December 19, 2016 06:38 PM)

Yeah this definitely deserved nods for Picture, Director, and Lead Actress at the very least. At least Ruth Gordon got a well-deserved award.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1534323https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1534323Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:39:32 GMT