This message has been deleted.

Why? By the time the PC crowd are finished with it Etta will be running the gang acting as a Robin Hood to the peasants of Bolivia feeding them with the bank money they steal. Unlike the original that just hinted at it they will probably also have her straight up involved with Butch and Sundance as well, both of them catering to her every whim.
Raindrops on my head being rapped by some guy who can't keep his pants up.
No. Please no.
Sometimes a movie or tv show plot is so stupid that only the stupid can understand it.

Jeezus, another remake moron. WTF is wrong with these people? The original should NEVER be remade, it holds up as well today as it did in 1969. Pitt and DiCaprio? Both are great at what they do but leave the classics alone.
I spend my money on dope, sex and cheap thrills.
The rest of it, I waste.

I think a Pitt / Clooney pairing would be better. I don't normally go for remakes of classic films but for some reason I think a remake of this film would work. And their sense of humour which they show in their acting would be perfect.
Reading the other comments, I do think the Bolvia portion of the film is the best bit I found the first hour a little slow with very little happening but in Bolvia the film goes into orbit with great action sequences, humour and action.

Which jack-ass did you think Dicaprio could play?

No. Just no. There is no movie pairing that will EVER match wjat redford and Newman had in terms of chemistry and banter. If they ever remade this movie it would flop and it would be a huge embarrassment to everyone involved.

The storyline is the most important part of the film not what the stars look like. Hollywood should be forced to not make remakes, create new and good storylines and scripts and entertain us properly. For the past 10 years you'll be lucky if one decent film has come out in each of the years.

Pitt and DiCaprio? Nothing against them but.NO NO NO NO NO (repeat until the page is full, printer)

What's wrong with the original? It would be better than 95% of what Hollywood spews out, but also pointless, unless you're the producer.

LDC reminds me of a jr high kid
suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

REMAKE????? loads both pistols

Sure. While you are at it, why don't you get them to remake the The Sting as well.
NQ!!!

There is no sense in remaking something that is already absolutely perfect. It would be akin to repainting the
Mona Lisa
.

Redford was no Laurence Olivier ya know.he basically plays the same snarky character in every movie he's in, including this one.
Don't get me wrong this movie is a classic, but Redford was a great-looking movie star, not necessarily a great
actor
.
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?

Gosling can't act his way out of a paper bag. Sick and tired of people saying hes a good actor, hes a lazy two bit actor.

Ryan Gosling and Michael Fassbender would be quite an interesting pair-up, I think.

"A man who does not spend time with his family can never be a real man."

No, no, no to the nth time! If Brad Pitt comes anywhere near this film I'll personally put a hit out on him. Natural heir to Robert Redford my a**!

hahaha.no contemporary actors have the stature and chemistry to remake this movie.

Please no remake. Nothing can top this movie.
Some stills as a reminder:
http://www.virtual-history.com/movie/film/5000/butch-cassidy-and-the-s undance-kid

Yeah, petegatt, I thoroughly agree. All these remakes and reboots seem like just lazily treading water, wasting an opportunity for telling new stories. Especially when the previous versions still work.
You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

Why does this generation feel the need to remake movies
Move on I say and think of something original

patrick wilson as butch (loos SO much like Newman) and brad pitt as sundance

http://www.iamsecond.com
LOST

I'd rather peel off my skin and roll in salt

I would rather stick needles in my eyes.
"I told you it was off." The Jackal