<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Got a question]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Medium Cool</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>preppy-3</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 12, 2009 08:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I heard this was the first mainstream film to have full frontal male nudity (which is probably why it got an X rating).  I saw it years ago but, aside from a VERY quick look at Forester's, I don't remember there being any male nudity at all.  Was just that quick peek considered that shocking back in 1969?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/182964/got-a-question</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:48:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/182964.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:14:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Got a question on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:15:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preppy-3</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 05, 2016 04:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It was originally given an X rating but was rerated to R on appeal.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536527</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:15:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Got a question on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:15:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fanaticita</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 05, 2016 11:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I watched the film on dvd and it was rated "R" not "X".</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536526</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536526</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:15:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Got a question on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:15:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preppy-3</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 24, 2009 12:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Actually "Midnight Cowboy's" X was NOT self-imposed.  The MPAA gave it an X.  It says it on IMDB and in a biography of director John Schlesinger by William Mann it says the same thing.  Schlesigner had no problem with the X because it was a film for adults anyways.  It was lowered (with no cuts) to an R because it was nominated for the Best Picture in the Academy Awards.  "Midnight" IS strong stuffbut never deserved an X rating.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536525</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536525</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:15:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Got a question on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:14:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>42ndStreetMemories</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 24, 2009 12:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"Midnight Cowboy"'s X was self-imposed. United Artists was the first to see a marketing advantage in the early days of having an X-rating. "Greetings" was the first true "X" and look how tame it is today.<br />
But after years of Rock Hudson-Doris Day sex comedies, bloodless shootouts and the dominance of the Catholic Church's Legion of Decency, the late sixties were pretty exciting in the movie theater - triggered by MGM's "Blow-Up". Once the moviegoer got a taste it was like a feeding frenzy.<br />
Jerry</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536524</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536524</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:14:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Got a question on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:14:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preppy-3</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 24, 2009 09:13 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I see your point.  "Midnight Cowboy" and "Greetings" were originally X rated but they really didn't deserve it.  Of course X rated films were just considered as adult movies (NOT porn) and played at mainstream theatres.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536523</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536523</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:14:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Got a question on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:14:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>42ndStreetMemories</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 24, 2009 06:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Vincent Canby wrote in his NYT review that the scene: "should give lust a good name".<br />
This is just one year after Valentio introduced the G-GP-R-X rating system which opened the door for scenes like this. So the shot of the female nipple was just as new as the brief nudity that you mentioned.<br />
It was an exciting time with films like "Midnight Cowboy", "Greetings", "Bonnie and Clyde", "Easy Rider", "Putney Swope" breaking down all the barriers and bringing a pulse back to Hollywood.<br />
Jerry</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536522</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1536522</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:14:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>