<![CDATA[seriously a remake?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums β€” MASH

msmythoftroy β€” 16 years ago(June 14, 2009 11:53 PM)

when you search MASH on here, there is a link for an in-developement M.A.S.Hplease for the love of all effing things do NOT tell me that means they're trying to remake the amazing Altman film..they're gonna eff it up..I LOVE the book, the movie and the show..do they REALLY need to do this?
"Floating falling sweet intoxication touch me trust me savor each sensation" ~The Phantom

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/183463/seriously-a-remakeRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 21:48:08 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:19 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:27 GMT]]>πŸ‘¨πŸ»πŸ’© πŸΆπŸ’© β€” 3 years ago(September 18, 2022 11:17 AM)

NO REHASH!!
β€œCall a SPADE, a SPADE; and a TRANNY, a TRANNY, or an IT!!!”.
"THAT'S SOME BAD
SHIT
,
HARRY
!".

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539999https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539999Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:26 GMT]]>evbatboy β€” 16 years ago(August 18, 2009 05:04 PM)

i like to think of it not as a remake, but as a motion picture version of the tv series

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539998https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539998Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:25 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539997https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539997Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:24 GMT]]>Polaris01313-1 β€” 16 years ago(August 01, 2009 12:13 AM)

Not really. I just did not see eye to eye with his views, let alone how he went about exercising them.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539996https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539996Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:23 GMT]]>moviewatcher42 β€” 16 years ago(July 28, 2009 10:54 AM)

"political liberal with a strong resentment against authroity"
You say that like it's a bad thing. πŸ™‚

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539995https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539995Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:22 GMT]]>Polaris01313-1 β€” 16 years ago(July 28, 2009 01:24 AM)

Robert Altman may have been brilliant in some areas. But in others, he was a political liberal with a strong resentment against authroity.
Loosely translated, he was an @!#hole!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539994https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539994Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:22 GMT]]>moviewatcher42 β€” 16 years ago(July 24, 2009 02:29 PM)

I'm appalled at the thoughbt of a remake, too. The difference between us is that I love this movie, ranking it easily among my top ten favorite films. I can certainly understand that you don't like it (though it's tough to imagine why), but it's truly a brilliant piece of work by a brilliant director. Would be a shame if someone tried to dumb it down in a remake.
"Hopefully in the remake they might actually write a script."
Hmm, really? Hopefully they won't remake it at all.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539993https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539993Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:21 GMT]]>Polaris01313-1 β€” 16 years ago(July 09, 2009 02:30 PM)

Technically, the series was a remake of the 1970 film, so in a sense, it already has been remade.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539992https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539992Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to seriously a remake? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:20 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539991https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1539991Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:20 GMT