<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[That&#x27;d be a good movie, right?  You&#x27;d see that, right?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Panic in Needle Park</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>iPadCary</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 23, 2017 12:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That'd be a good movie, right?  You'd see that, right?<br />
Both Al Pacino &amp; Kitty Winn could reprise thier iconic roles!<br />
Like, you could have the dope peddlers on the mean streets of the city,<br />
giving the hopheads their "fix".  Then, when one of 'em gets sick<br />
from bad smack, they get together to clean up this town .<br />
the hard way .<br />
That's a good movie, right?  You'd see that, rignt?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/184410/that-d-be-a-good-movie-right-you-d-see-that-right</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 10:26:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/184410.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:45:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That&#x27;d be a good movie, right?  You&#x27;d see that, right? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:45:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SealedCargo</strong> — <em>1 year ago(February 25, 2025 03:32 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Panic 2: Electric Needaloo<br />
The Fearmakers Blog<br />
<a href="https://thefearmakers.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://thefearmakers.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1549143</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1549143</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:45:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That&#x27;d be a good movie, right?  You&#x27;d see that, right? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:45:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>vicky_lc2001</strong> — <em>1 year ago(May 19, 2024 03:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The OP was joking.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1549142</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1549142</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:45:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That&#x27;d be a good movie, right?  You&#x27;d see that, right? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:45:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>7 years ago(April 12, 2018 12:03 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No. A sequel to this film would seriously suck. And your revenge idea blows massive hose!<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1549141</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1549141</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:45:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>