<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The mystery of communication.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Walkabout</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>eyebrowmorroco</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 10, 2013 01:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In the end, lives are destroyed, in one way or another, because two people could not invent a way to make their needs and dreams clear.<br />
The film suggests that all of us are captives of environment and programming: there is a wide range of experience that remains forever invisible to us, because it falls in a spectrum we simply cannot see.</p>
<ul>
<li>Roger Ebert<br />
Great insight into the film and life. Roeg ingeniously plays on this by making the film such a visual experience.</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/184653/the-mystery-of-communication</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 05:16:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/184653.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:22:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>