<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Now firstly I am not advocating either a remake or a return with Michael Crawford in the role, he is too old and couldn&#x27;]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>tgrrrsss</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 06, 2010 03:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Now firstly I am not advocating either a remake or a return with Michael Crawford in the role, he is too old and couldn't (I doubt) do things he did then in the show), neither would you really have a way of making a new show because of the compairsons - not to mention insurance and costs I doubt the BBC would even consider these days.<br />
However how would Frank cope in 21st century Britain, what would he be like today (set as the same age he and Betty were then).<br />
What ways would mobile phones, internet, email's digitial technology, faster cars, all sorts of different foods - what sorts of things would Franks be involved in today?<br />
It's difficult becauase the show is mostly tiimeless - apart from obvious technological things - for instance going to the Writer across the road as they'd have a phone and mobiles today. Likewise Bettty would not be in hospital for a fortnight after a minor (what was it anyway) operation.<br />
I'm sure there are other things different fom the time the show was made, but anyway suggestions please.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/185686/now-firstly-i-am-not-advocating-either-a-remake-or-a-return-with-michael-crawford-in-the-role-he-is-too-old-and-couldn</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:58:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/185686.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:29:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Now firstly I am not advocating either a remake or a return with Michael Crawford in the role, he is too old and couldn&#x27; on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:29:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prismark10</strong> — <em>14 years ago(May 19, 2011 04:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Get the right star and you can remake this in an updated way.<br />
Its that man again!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1558836</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1558836</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:29:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Now firstly I am not advocating either a remake or a return with Michael Crawford in the role, he is too old and couldn&#x27; on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:29:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>aspartame</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 10, 2010 09:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">agreed!<br />
yeah i wonder what betty was in for? bit of trouble maybe hehe.<br />
i could just see frank showing up at those 'talent' auditions, dance auditions and idol auditions.  imagine !!<br />
both my daughters love the comedy, so i guess it still resonates with todays youth, the innocence of it perhaps.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1558835</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1558835</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:29:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>