<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Happy Days</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Galactus03</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 21, 2016 06:19 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still some good episodes but it just got sillier, more and more anachronisms etc. It was almost a different show all together. Still had it's charms I guess.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186365/once-it-went-to-studio-audience-different-sets-etc-it-began-a-descent-to-something-lesser-sure-there-were-still-som</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:54:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186365.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wordsatplaytoday</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 07, 2017 01:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">When did Fonzie go from being this normal laid back guy who showed up once in a while to add a few quiet words of wisdom to the cartoon somewhat superhuman who can knock doors off hinges, play a song on the jukebox with just a tap and gets a girl wet and to him with the snap of his fingers?<br />
Humans are not the only species on earth.<br />
We just act like it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564030</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564030</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ItsEddieHaskellBeyotch</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 05, 2017 04:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I like the whole series altogether. I'm not partial to any particular version between the early episodes or studio audience ones. I will agree with most that there was a dip in quality in the show once Ron Howard and Don Most left.<br />
When there's no more room in Hollywood, remakes shall walk the Earth.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564029</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564029</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TorontoJediMaster</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 02, 2017 12:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I actually liked the later episodes better.<br />
The first two seasons were much more period oriented and you could tell that the cast chemistry really hadn't gelled yet.<br />
I always thought that as the show progressed it was more about the interaction between the characters and the cast chemistry rather than trying to be all about the 1950's.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564028</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564028</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DrakeStraw</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 25, 2016 10:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"The Field-Goal-Kicking Donkey"<br />
Was that<br />
Gus (1976)<br />
? That 5.8 Disney flick was definitely silly, yet inexplicably Ed Asner and Don Knotts (not so surprisingly) were in it.<br />
DrakeStraw<br />
LinkLikeThis<br />
[link=tt0074599]</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564027</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564027</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tmaj48</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 25, 2016 12:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I loved the first few seasons of the show, but later seasons were just wretchedly awful. I remember hearing an interview with Ron Howard on the<br />
Howard Stern Show<br />
years ago in which Howard talks about why he stopped doing movies for a time in Hollywood (until<br />
American Graffiti<br />
). He complained that he kept getting offers from Disney to star in kiddie-oriented fluff such as "The Field-Goal-Kicking Donkey" and similar stuff. He was able to turn that down for being too silly, yet the kinds of plotlines he was involved with in the later seasons<br />
of<br />
Happy Days<br />
were worse, especially since it had started out as a more adult-oriented series. Did he even realize how fatuous the show became, or was he<br />
just pocketing the paycheck and pretending not to notice? Personally, I would rather watch a goofy Disney live-action movie of that era than a single episode of one of the later seasons of this series.<br />
I'm not crying, you fool, I'm laughing!<br />
Hewwo.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564026</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564026</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rhs6358</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 30, 2016 07:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I really can't watch any episodes with the studio audience. The early episodes are modeled after the "Love, American Style" pilot (Love and the Happy Days) and are quaint, charming and entertaining. They stayed with the feel of the 1950's nicely. Once it became The Fonzie Show, they time-warped to 1975, had long hair, wire-rimmed glasses, etc. The expressions of the 1950's were no longer used ("made in the shade", "how would you like a knuckle sandwich", etc.). It was just another below-average sitcom by then. At least we have DVDs.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564025</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564025</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sean_ohlson-1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 19, 2016 09:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I totally agree!  The first season was great.  It went downhill fast though.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564024</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564024</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Liburnius</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 06, 2016 08:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wasn't Season 1 of this show more like it was truly trying to be a period comedy, rather than a show supposed to be set in the '50s, but obviously influenced by the '70s? It seems that hairstyles and clothing styles got more 1970s/1980s, after the first season or two.<br />
"A New Kind of Man" (John Foxx, 1980):</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564023</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564023</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..once it went to studio audience, different sets etc. it began a descent to something lesser. Sure there were still som on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>PigWont</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 21, 2016 06:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Seasons 3-5 are my favorites. I like season 2 much better than 1. It is very similar to season 3.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564022</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1564022</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:52:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>