<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Will a remake have the indisputable monetary correction in the title?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Six Million Dollar Man</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jose-boscolo</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 11, 2016 05:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I mean, it should 60 billion dollar man now?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186559/will-a-remake-have-the-indisputable-monetary-correction-in-the-title</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 22:06:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186559.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Will a remake have the indisputable monetary correction in the title? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Frequency270</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 15, 2016 07:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Or, "Cyborg".<br />
Damion Crowley<br />
All complaints about my post go to Helen Waite.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565872</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565872</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Will a remake have the indisputable monetary correction in the title? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>toothgrinder67</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 19, 2016 12:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The six billion dollar man maybe?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565871</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565871</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Will a remake have the indisputable monetary correction in the title? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>RIP_IMDb</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 16, 2016 04:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">$60 BILLION?!?! It WOULDN'T even be $60 million. Closer to $36 million!<br />
I'll let you know when I come-up with a new signature,<br />
.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565870</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565870</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Will a remake have the indisputable monetary correction in the title? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mactach</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 14, 2016 12:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Let's not even think about it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565869</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565869</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>