<![CDATA[I mean, it should 60 billion dollar man now?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Six Million Dollar Man

jose-boscolo — 10 years ago(March 11, 2016 05:06 AM)

I mean, it should 60 billion dollar man now?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186560/i-mean-it-should-60-billion-dollar-man-nowRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 01:23:09 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:47 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I mean, it should 60 billion dollar man now? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:51 GMT]]>Frequency270 — 9 years ago(April 15, 2016 07:28 AM)

Or, "Cyborg".
Damion Crowley
All complaints about my post go to Helen Waite.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565877https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565877Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I mean, it should 60 billion dollar man now? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:50 GMT]]>toothgrinder67 — 10 years ago(March 19, 2016 12:04 PM)

The six billion dollar man maybe?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565876https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565876Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I mean, it should 60 billion dollar man now? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:49 GMT]]>RIP_IMDb — 10 years ago(March 16, 2016 04:05 AM)

$60 BILLION?!?! It WOULDN'T even be $60 million. Closer to $36 million!
I'll let you know when I come-up with a new signature,
.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565875https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565875Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I mean, it should 60 billion dollar man now? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:48 GMT]]>mactach — 10 years ago(March 14, 2016 12:09 PM)

Let's not even think about it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565874https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1565874Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:21:48 GMT