<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Since we&#x27;d been used to De Niro as being Vito the entire film, I&#x27;m glad Brando didn&#x27;t make the epilogue cameo as Coppola]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Godfather: Part II</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>SealedCargo</strong> — <em>4 years ago(February 19, 2022 01:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Since we'd been used to De Niro as being Vito the entire film, I'm glad Brando didn't make the epilogue cameo as Coppola wanted because seeing Brando again would be a reminder that, basically, De Niro doesn't look like a young Brando in this film, which doesn't matter because his acting is so great and he created his own Vito, but…<br />
It was so much better having James Caan back… After the tragedy of the entire epic, having someone as animated and upbeat was very needed…<br />
It was perfect how they all left Michael in the room to meet the unseen Vito…<br />
It's a trip how in those days the unintended "mistakes" would only make movies better…<br />
The Fearmakers Blog<br />
<a href="https://thefearmakers.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://thefearmakers.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186857/since-we-d-been-used-to-de-niro-as-being-vito-the-entire-film-i-m-glad-brando-didn-t-make-the-epilogue-cameo-as-coppola</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 23:52:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186857.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:01:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>