<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Senator Geary]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Godfather: Part II</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>michael-judd</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 29, 2016 12:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">One thing I could never figure out in the Senate Hearings. before it all begins, Senator Geary excuses himself from the proceedings, but not before giving this long, rambling speech about "the great Italian-American people". Rousing speech for sure, but all it says to me is "I've been bought by Michael Corleone and because of this great big speech I'm giving, now you all know it". Was this the intention? Was he excusing himself because he couldn't support action against the guy whose pocket he's in, and he wanted EVERYONE in the room to know this?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186864/senator-geary</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 09:48:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/186864.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:01:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MagicSlim</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 26, 2016 05:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Remember also that he thought at that point that Michael was cooked. Its low risk to extricate himself but the reason (he was either blackmailed into stepping down or to avoid implicating himself by defending Michael or simply to stick it to Michael without upsetting his Italian constituents) is less important than creating the drama of a further betrayal for Michael.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568423</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568423</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>movieghoul</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 22, 2016 01:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's not that they couldn't kill him, they could have easily. The point is he was worth much more to them alive than dead. THe prostitute scene is analogous to the horse's head scene in One, except they've upped the ante.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568422</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lukeh41</strong> — <em>5 years ago(April 15, 2020 06:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No, they couldn't just kill him. He was a friggin US Senator. Good thing for the mafia you were never a boss, lol.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568421</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568421</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>movieghoul</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 22, 2016 12:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's not that they couldn't kill him, they could have easily. The point is he was worth much more to them alive than dead. THe prostitute scene is analogous to the horse's head scene in One, except they've upped the ante.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568420</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568420</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>blaugranaomuerte</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 21, 2016 09:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Remember the opening scene when Geary and Michael talked in private? Remember the smug tone Geary used in speaking towards Michael and about Michael's family?<br />
Now do you remember the brothel scene later on? Where Geary supposedly 'passed out' and 'killed' the prostitute he was with?<br />
The two are connected. They couldn't just 'whack' the guy for his brash attitude, he's a US Senator, that would bring way too much heat. Instead they blackmailed him. Not only did he commit adultery with a prostitute (which was a far bigger sin for politicians in the 50s than it is today), but she was also found slaughtered in bed with him (he didn't actually kill her, though). They got him hook, line and sinker.<br />
Thus you have the reason he excused himself from the Committee. The Corleone family had dirt on him; major dirt. So he was blackmailed into stepping down.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568419</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568419</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>OptimumTaurus</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 14, 2016 01:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Pat Geary was loosely based on Pat McCarran, who was a US Senator from Nevada from 1933 to 1954.<br />
Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgment.<br />
-Michael Corleone</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568418</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ddhddh</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 27, 2016 06:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It was based on an actual event by an actual senator during the Kefauer (sp?) crime hearings of the late 50's.  I don't have time to look up the specifics, but there are several nods to actual mob history in the two films.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568417</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568417</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jeff0015</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 08, 2016 03:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't think it was so outrageous back in the 50s. Part of michaels defense is that he was being persecuted because he is Italian. Gearys speech just reminded the public of that. To your point though, the chairman did roll his eyes at Geary ha.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568416</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568416</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tngtest</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 20, 2016 09:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Even though the Geary character is in the late 50's, he reminds me of the current Senator from Nevada (Reid). The prospect of Harry Reid being tied in with the mob would help explain his "accident" last year with the exercise equipment.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568415</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568415</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>OddsAreIAmRight</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 11, 2016 01:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Geary wasn't bought, he was blackmailed into supporting Michael's Vegas expansion.  Geary hates Michael.<br />
His dramatic monologue before leaving the hearings is to be a faade to give the appearance he is helping Michael without giving the actual help Michael really needs during the hearings (which would hurt Geary politically.)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568414</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568414</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:02:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:01:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>michael-judd</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 30, 2016 12:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe it's just the way I'm reading the scene, but it seems like he's so obviously saying "look at me - I've been bought!" with that speech, that surely all his colleagues on that panel will now suspect him / try to destroy him for being corrupt and in the pocket of a mobster. A powerful friend like that works best when no-one knows they work for you, the impact is lessened if everyone knows to beware Geary, because he's Michael's puppet.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568413</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568413</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:01:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Senator Geary on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:01:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Hancock_the_Superb</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 29, 2016 06:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">My read on the scene is just Geary weaseling his way out of an uncomfortable position. On the one hand, as Michael's pawn he can't oppose the guy publicly. On the other, he doesn't want to tip his hand to the Senate. Geary, being a politician, finds a solution that allows him to save face to both Michael and his colleagues on the commission without having to do a damned thing.<br />
I'm afraid that you underestimate the number of subjects in which I take an interest!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568412</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1568412</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:01:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>