<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Unethical &amp; Total Dishonest]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Jeffersons</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>snorlax3111984</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 13, 2016 07:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm confused about something from the episode where George claims to be a descendant of Thomas Jefferson.<br />
Cal Robert, the ad executive, asks Louise to hear his idea for an ad campaign because women are a big part of the consumer market. Cal never asks Louise for her thoughts after revealing the plan to name George as Thomas Jefferson's great-great-great grandson. When Louise establishes her disgust with the ad campaign (calling it unethical and totally dishonest), Cal never really makes any attempt to justify the campaign to Louise.<br />
Why does Cal ask for Louise to hear his idea and then seem so indifferent to what her opinion is? Is he at all concerned that other women may be as disgusted with the campaign as Louise is?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/187467/unethical-total-dishonest</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 22:49:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/187467.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:29:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unethical &amp; Total Dishonest on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:29:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MandrasAndPelagia</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 21, 2017 06:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But those events with Edith happened AFTER the Jeffersons episode. Haha.<br />
You're never fully dressed without a smile.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1573851</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1573851</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:29:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unethical &amp; Total Dishonest on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:29:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>snorlax3111984</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 27, 2016 09:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"That's probably because he wasn't thinking clearly. He must not have fully recovered from the burnt cake that Edith threw in his face and being prosecuted for attempted rape "<br />
R.O.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1573850</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1573850</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:29:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unethical &amp; Total Dishonest on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:29:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>McGannahanSkjellyfetti</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 13, 2016 09:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's probably because he wasn't thinking clearly. He must not have fully recovered from the burnt cake that Edith threw in his face and being prosecuted for attempted rape</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1573849</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1573849</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:29:28 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>