I blame trump

So Sir Paul can't ID as Angela Lansbury anymore?
Tell you what…When I send my ex-wife her money…you can lick the stamps.

explain gender to us, yermie!
My password is password.

Lol!!!!! Progressive warped reality isn't real. You're an idiot.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot

^^this
My password is password.

Tell me you never took a basic entry level biology course without telling me

^^flailing, and triggered
My password is password.

I'm fat and gay.
FIFY.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot

^^won the debate with solid counterpoints, per usual
My password is password.

You still don’t know gender is a social construct?
Lol! You're dumb.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot

Nick Freedom said...
At birth, dum dum.
You think they hit puberty at birth? You are a dumbfuck

AnthonySocksssss said...
no it isn’t, considering they haven’t even hit puberty yet, you absolute dumbfuck
At birth, dum dum.

Nick Freedom said...
However gender ITSELF is cut and dry based on biological sexual anatomy at birth.
no it isn’t, considering they haven’t even hit puberty yet, you absolute dumbfuck

AnthonySocksssss said...
The point is that gender roles are not cut and dry based on sexual anatomy, dingus
Glad you agree
You lose again
However gender ITSELF is cut and dry based on biological sexual anatomy at birth.

BOOMSHIT said...
gotcha. anything else?
Cry more for me

AnthonySocksssss said...
I pardon you
gotcha. anything else?
jestergooning

BOOMSHIT said...
gotcha. anything else?
I pardon you

AnthonySocksssss said...
^ still goin this asshole
gotcha. anything else?
jestergooning

BOOMSHIT said...
gotcha. anything else?
^ still goin this asshole

AnthonySocksssss said...
The point is that gender roles are not cut and dry based on sexual anatomy, dingus
Glad you agree
You lose again
gotcha. anything else?
jestergooning

BOOMSHIT said...
men were probably allowed to gather and cook and play with the kids too. people being able to perform multiple tasks is irrelevant.
regardless, you are admitting that you think gender roles magically appeared out of thin air and served no purpose in human development
kys retard
The point is that gender roles are not cut and dry based on sexual anatomy, dingus
Glad you agree
You lose again

AnthonySocksssss said...
“While the commonly held view is that men were hunters and women were gatherers in hunter-gatherer societies, research suggests that this division was not always fixed. Many studies show that women were actively involved in hunting, sometimes even more than men.“
There goes your theory again, you dogfucking dipshit
men were probably allowed to gather and cook and play with the kids too. people being able to perform multiple tasks is irrelevant.
regardless, you are admitting that you think gender roles magically appeared out of thin air and served no purpose in human development
kys retard
jestergooning

“While the commonly held view is that men were hunters and women were gatherers in hunter-gatherer societies, research suggests that this division was not always fixed. Many studies show that women were actively involved in hunting, sometimes even more than men.“
There goes your theory again, you dogfucking dipshit

did that role and behavior magically appear out of thin air? or was it caused by something? perhaps a need for efficient allocation of human labor in hunter gatherer societies?
anyways. you are pedo.
jestergooning