<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I think so.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Night of the Seagulls</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>charliemfbrown</strong> — <em>19 years ago(August 02, 2006 05:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think so.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/187989/i-think-so</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:50:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/187989.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>9 months ago(June 17, 2025 11:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Return of the Blind Dead is my all-time favorite entry, but this one serves as a really strong and worthy closer to the series.<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577815</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577815</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>zachtheman</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 28, 2012 02:21 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">best to worst imo<br />
1<br />
4<br />
2<br />
3</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577814</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577814</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577813</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577813</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BrokenMirrorsbrokenMinds</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 27, 2012 10:24 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree with the person who said The Ghost Galleon had excellent atmosphere. That was the best part of the movie, for me, and the total sense of dread. But anywho, I would definitely rank "Seagulls" as my favourite of the sequels. "Return" is very good, but seeing the Templars moving around everywhere, unlike the first one where they were used more sparingly, sort of lessened their impact. Not by much, just a little. It was like Freddy in Nightmare 2.<br />
These are all nitpicks though. Overall, I really enjoy all 4 parts thoroughly (save for Ghost Galleon: the acting, the obvious low budget)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577812</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577812</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jjk50</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 30, 2011 11:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know if this was the best sequel but the the women in this one were the best looking of all the four movies. Too bad there wasn't more nudity.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577811</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577811</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577810</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577810</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577809</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577809</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pynkpanther</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 14, 2009 01:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i liked tombs of the blind dead better, but this one was great.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577808</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577808</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>The-Green-Fuz</strong> — <em>16 years ago(October 20, 2009 09:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm sure you're not, but you sound like a horny fifteen year old.<br />
To the OP,<br />
I have trouble picking my favourite of the series because they all have something different that I really dig them for. Also, while do recognize that it was a pretty bad movie technically, I think that<br />
The Ghost Galleon<br />
has some of the best eerie atmosphere of all of them and I absolutely love the setting and concept. I suppose if I had to pick a favourite of the sequels,<br />
Night of the Seagulls<br />
would come out on top.<br />
"Past this tunnel is the rest of the world.."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577807</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577807</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jeffyoung1</strong> — <em>16 years ago(April 30, 2009 02:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm not sure it's the best of the Blind Dead Series but it's a contender.  I'd say all the nudity helps, even though there wasn't enough of it.<br />
Beautiful and busty Susana Estrada is wasted early in the movie as a sacrifice to the ancient Templars, when they were still alive and human.<br />
Busty Susana Estrada's implants are betrayed when the head knight Templar rips her bodice apart and her breast assumes an odd, 'squeezed' shape as if it were made of clay.  Unfortunately, full nudity was not yet a feature of Euro-horror films at this time.  It would have been nice to see 'all' of the lovely maidens.<br />
Another poster said this fourth installment of the Blind Dead series had a H.P. Lovecraft 'feel' to it, and I agree, given its gothic, moody, atmospheric seaside coastal town mystery to it.  You just naturally sense something unnatural and supernatural going on.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577806</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577806</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>smoovasbutter</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 17, 2009 09:31 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think this was easily the best of the series. I loved the Lovecraftian plot. The characters were less annoying and more likeable. The castle location was great. Very Roger Corman like. The blind dead themselves have very little screen time, which adds to the tension and buildup, so when they do appear, it means that much more. Afterall, in Jaws, we hardly ever got to see the shark, which made it a better movie!<br />
ALso I liked the fact that this movie left out all the stupid lesbian-rape-sex scenes that I thought were unnessary in the other films. And the movie itself had less plot holes than the other films.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577805</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577805</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NoseofNicko</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 13, 2009 10:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Return Of The Evil Dead is my favorite.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577804</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577804</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nosnojsirhc</strong> — <em>18 years ago(July 15, 2007 11:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i think lord of the rings ripped on these, eh?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577802</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577802</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheGrindhouse</strong> — <em>18 years ago(May 27, 2007 03:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, Night of the Seagulls is good but I like Return of the Blind Dead better.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577801</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577801</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rhernster</strong> — <em>18 years ago(February 12, 2008 10:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Doctor's choice of jumper was funny.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577800</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577800</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WinstonNephron</strong> — <em>18 years ago(January 01, 2008 05:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">They each have their good points and faults, but yes, I like this one better.<br />
<a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.prisonplanet.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://web.alternet.org/stories/67663/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://web.alternet.org/stories/67663/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577799</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577799</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577798</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577798</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>charliemfbrown</strong> — <em>19 years ago(December 03, 2006 07:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The idea WAS great but was just shot SO murky it was hard to get into it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577797</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577797</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577796</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577796</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577795</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577795</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>charliemfbrown</strong> — <em>19 years ago(August 28, 2006 03:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think I liked tombs more, just cause of the origin story, etc.  Maybe also because it was the first in the series I watched?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577794</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577794</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>amboager</strong> — <em>19 years ago(August 26, 2006 10:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love Night of the Seagulls. I like even more than Tombs of the Blind Dead. I think than NOTS is the only one in the series that tells a real story (i love Lovecraftian stuff in movies) and more profesional actors. Great seaside town atmosphere (i love -again- this type of movies: The Fog, Dead &amp; Buried ) and it even has a poetic touch: the seagulls as the spirits of the sacrified women). The moral is far more complex with the village habitants so (or more) vile as the Templars.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577793</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577793</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>charliemfbrown</strong> — <em>19 years ago(August 20, 2006 08:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In fact the only sequel I didn't care for was part 3, which made me almost not watch this one.  I am glad I did.  Excellent.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577792</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1577792</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:33:16 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>