<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Can you help the Library of Congress ID these super odd TV stills?  Thx.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Classic TV</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>codell76</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 05, 2016 07:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://blogs.loc.gov/now-see-hear/2016/09/mystery-photos-5-small-screen-obscurities/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://blogs.loc.gov/now-see-hear/2016/09/mystery-photos-5-small-screen-obscurities/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/188568/can-you-help-the-library-of-congress-id-these-super-odd-tv-stills-thx</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 16:08:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/188568.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:56:55 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can you help the Library of Congress ID these super odd TV stills?  Thx. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:56:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jimdarling</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 21, 2016 05:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Invalid link.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1582861</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1582861</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:56:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>