<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[You don&#x27;t need to have seen a DOGMA 95 movie to answer this question.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Experimental and Avant-Garde</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDB_Vits</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 04, 2014 05:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I read the rules of the manifesto. Most of them indicate that the purpose of the movement is to make a movie without any gimmicks (including making it<br />
black<br />
&amp;<br />
white<br />
). But by doing that, you're making a movie that's different from the majority. Isn't that a gimmick?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/188925/you-don-t-need-to-have-seen-a-dogma-95-movie-to-answer-this-question</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 13:32:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/188925.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to You don&#x27;t need to have seen a DOGMA 95 movie to answer this question. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>luka-ekhvaia</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 21, 2015 09:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think you don't understand the gist of this movement. They were against individualist/liberal/bourgeois movie and meantime they meant that gimmicks were instrument for manipulating with people. One of there principle was rejection fraudulence.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1585631</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1585631</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>