<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Are Andy Warhol movies any good ?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Experimental and Avant-Garde</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Awkward-Human</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 21, 2013 03:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I personally<br />
hate<br />
Andy Warhol movies.<br />
There are pointless and to long.<br />
Like all of Warhol's works, one does not need to see this film to understand all of it. It works better as an idea rather than a product, while lacking the boldness of, say, Duchamp's Fountain.<br />
I am not trying to be rude but can some one please tell why are they clammed by the critics.<br />
And If you like them , can you please explain me ?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/188927/are-andy-warhol-movies-any-good</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 20:53:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/188927.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are Andy Warhol movies any good ? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mrpinbert</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 01, 2015 04:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I heard the films he produced with Paul Morrisey as Director are actually pretty good. They are Flesh for Frankenstein and Blood for Dracula.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1585637</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1585637</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are Andy Warhol movies any good ? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Madotsuki_the_Dreamer</strong> — <em>12 years ago(August 27, 2013 05:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That was one of Paul Morrissey's films released under the Andy Warhol moniker.  Andy Warhol himself made films that were mostly designed to be unwatchable - like, for example, a single 8-hour shot of the Empire State Building.  He forced the audience to reconsider their perceptions of cinema by making even the slightest event - like the lights on the building turning off - into something thrilling.  Well, either that or he was just playing a prank on people.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1585636</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1585636</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are Andy Warhol movies any good ? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1585635</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1585635</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:43:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>