<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[writers whos works are over analysed?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Screenwriters</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>MustardOfDoom23</strong> — <em>15 years ago(February 25, 2011 11:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Shakespeare. i don't think the guy wrote with as much 'meaning' as what he was made out to. yes i will admit he was a great writer and without him we may not even have modern storytelling but when he wrote things like Romeo and Juliet did he really intend to have all of those 'meanings'? i'm not sure he set out to creat meanings so therefore i think he has been over analysed by the pretentiousness ofb 'experts' and teachers. especially teachers. well, maybe thats just especially MINE, who over analyses everything.<br />
ok done<br />
Hello, handsome, is that a ten-gallon hat or are you just enjoying the show?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189210/writers-whos-works-are-over-analysed</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:20:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189210.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to writers whos works are over analysed? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MustardOfDoom23</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 13, 2015 08:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Winter's Tale is my favourite text in my course and Much ado about Nothing is my favourite overall.<br />
"I loved you in Wall Street!"</p>
<ul>
<li>Hot Shots Part Deux</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587889</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587889</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to writers whos works are over analysed? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ThatMOVIENut</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 13, 2015 05:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Any favourites so far?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587888</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587888</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to writers whos works are over analysed? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MustardOfDoom23</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 01, 2015 05:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, yeah. I chose to take the course so obviously i am interested in his work.<br />
"I loved you in Wall Street!"</p>
<ul>
<li>Hot Shots Part Deux</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587887</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587887</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to writers whos works are over analysed? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ThatMOVIENut</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 01, 2015 05:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Has your view changed?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587886</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587886</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to writers whos works are over analysed? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MustardOfDoom23</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 27, 2015 04:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Heh, four years changes you. I'm studying Shakespeare.<br />
"I loved you in Wall Street!"</p>
<ul>
<li>Hot Shots Part Deux</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587885</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587885</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to writers whos works are over analysed? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ThatMOVIENut</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 27, 2015 09:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well any such experience is subjective, and thus, interpretations vary. While how much a writer intended is always up for debate, ultimately, a work has to stand on its own, and thus, is subject to whatever the viewer/reader projects onto it/the context they bring with them.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587884</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1587884</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:39 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>