𝙽𝚈𝙲 []

Just say you dislike King Kong ‘76 and love the ‘33 and ‘05 versions along with the other sheeple and move on, dumbass.
Also, how hilarious that all people in this thread disagree with your stupid post.

I liked that particular change to the story. It made this film different from the original and gave the picture a nicely pointed anti-corporation central message to boot.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

What are you talking about? The original and the 2005 were all about greedy men. It was greedy of them to kidnap Kong and make money off him. That's the point of the story.
"1-800 Spank me? I know that number." Scott Calvin, The Santa Clause.

I'm with you there though maybe I'm biased somewhat because I saw the '76 version years before the '33 and as a kid didn't find it too campy and actually (comparatively) realistic as a giant monster movie.

I'm just the opposite- I've always thought the oil company looking for a big strike on an uncharted island made more sense plotwise than a Depression era movie director traveling thousands of miles to film a movie on a uncharted island.

the movie-making idea is probably cooler, but the oil idea definitely 'works'. First of all, this was the 1970's, in which there was a major oil shortage, so it was a commodity. Hence, the Grodin character really portrays capitalism.
Thats kinda what the Kong film is about Grabbing this monkey out of his home, to profit on it.. Very much works with Big Oil. Them some shady muthereffers.

This message has been deleted.

I liked it. Personally, I like how different the 76 remake is from the original (as well as the 2005 one). Don't get me wrong, the original is and will always be my favourite, but I enjoy how this is just as much it's own movie as it is a remake.