<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[just plain AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — King Kong</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ravnla-55-110542</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 07, 2016 08:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">seemed liked a bad TV movie. gave it a 3. jeesh</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189394/just-plain-awful</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:15:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189394.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to just plain AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Eric-62-2</strong> — <em>5 years ago(September 07, 2020 07:03 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The film IMO needs to be judged on its own terms, independent of the 1933 film.   On that level it succeeds, whereas Jackson's deliberate attempt to copycat and one-up the 1933 film was just wrong on all levels.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588814</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588814</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to just plain AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>8 years ago(November 26, 2017 01:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's flawed, but still pretty good overall. 7 out of 10 from me.<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588813</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588813</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to just plain AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ConnerysToupee</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 08, 2017 05:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, Kong's first appearance is built up VERY well.  I actually love this movie until it moves off Skull Island.  Same with the '05 version.<br />
Murdoch:  Climb, baby, climb!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588812</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588812</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to just plain AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>joker4252</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 31, 2016 12:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The alter scene is an incredible scene and one of my all time favorites.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588811</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588811</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to just plain AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ConnerysToupee</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 30, 2016 10:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No way.  Not perfect, but no where near a 3.  A solid 7.5.  Very entertaining.<br />
Murdoch:  Climb, baby, climb!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588810</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1588810</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:36:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>