<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[King Kong HAS to take place in the 1930s.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — King Kong</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>kevin-bergin</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 09, 2015 07:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is too difficult to believe that modern planes-1970s vintage-couldn't easily avoid and destroy Kong. Those 1930 planes were a closer contest.<br />
"It's the system, Lara. People will be different after the Revolution."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189429/king-kong-has-to-take-place-in-the-1930s</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 08:33:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189429.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:41:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to King Kong HAS to take place in the 1930s. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:41:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NYG11</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 17, 2016 06:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If you want to be technical, even the 30's biplanes could've taken Kong out while staying well out of his reach.  But that would've been much less dramatic.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1589123</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1589123</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:41:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>