<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I had to keep the subtitles to the film on the entire time to try and decipher what was being said.  The dialogue was va]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Missouri Breaks</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mdupla1</strong> — <em>17 years ago(October 10, 2008 08:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I had to keep the subtitles to the film on the entire time to try and decipher what was being said.  The dialogue was vague and almost cryptic on top of being difficult to hear.  I'll have to watch it again one day to see if the film grows on me or not, but I can see why the picture was disapointing to audiences when it came out.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189711/i-had-to-keep-the-subtitles-to-the-film-on-the-entire-time-to-try-and-decipher-what-was-being-said-the-dialogue-was-va</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 12:32:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189711.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:22:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I had to keep the subtitles to the film on the entire time to try and decipher what was being said.  The dialogue was va on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:22:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Wuchakk</strong> — <em>13 years ago(February 15, 2013 03:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, it's best to watch it with subtitles. You get more from it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1591691</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1591691</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:22:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>