<![CDATA[Only Faye Dunaway saves this.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Network

LetThemEatCake01 — 9 years ago(June 16, 2016 01:19 AM)

Her acting, just like all her filmography, is new, fresh, ever present, even back then. She was way ahead of her peers in the naturalistic acting while still being stylized. Everybody else is, by comparison, wooden, dead or a cringe worthy cheesy mess (Holden). The story is boring, the premise ridiculous, this is no great movie, Faye Dunaway is the only jolt of electricity in this, like the thunder in the poster.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189890/only-faye-dunaway-saves-thisRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 16:08:08 GMTWed, 29 Apr 2026 05:45:39 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Only Faye Dunaway saves this. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:45:42 GMT]]>jrhpax — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 08:40 PM)

I don't agree with most of the post, except that Faye Dunaway is one of the most brilliant (and these days, underrated) actresses who has ever lived. Why she hasn't received the AFI Lifetime Achievement Award is scandalous.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593119https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593119Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:45:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Only Faye Dunaway saves this. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:45:41 GMT]]>The-Last-Prydonian — 9 years ago(August 11, 2016 07:23 AM)

Your take on this brilliant classic is evidence of buffoonery. I pity you.
Opinions are like beep everyone got one.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593118https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593118Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:45:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Only Faye Dunaway saves this. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:45:40 GMT]]>!!!deleted!!! (63057267) — 9 years ago(August 09, 2016 08:21 AM)

Your take on this brilliant classic is evidence of buffoonery. I pity you.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593117https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593117Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:45:40 GMT