<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This Movie Is Great !!!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Network</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jojomack2006</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 20, 2016 09:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Anybody who doesn't like this movie; or doesn't think it's Great, can kiss my patootey!! It's not the Greatest film (that's Death Wish-in my opinion) but damnit! It's up there on top! I have a stack of very sacred, Special movies; Sgt. York, Kingdom of Heaven, Blade Runner (you go Ridley Scott!) Nebraska, Lady from Shanghi, well Networks in there, up there! Dammit! It's good. When I watch it I enjoy myself! So there !!! .What else can you ask of a movie?!?!!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189919/this-movie-is-great</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 16:07:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189919.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:50:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This Movie Is Great !!! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:50:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kinsociojey</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 12, 2016 07:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Network is nearly flawless.  I've only spotted one imperfection.  I won't mention it specifically, because once you hear it, you'll never un-hear it.<br />
As far as the technical side, I'd put Network in the Citizen Kane category.  Not for technical achievement/innovation, but for effect.  It also has the same theatrical feel (as opposed to cinematic).<br />
Network might be the best overall combination of writing, directing, casting, acting, cinematography, and editing.  People these days get caught up in the "it's so prescient!" aspect of it, which I think is a disservice.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/10074958/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/10074958/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593438</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593438</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:50:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This Movie Is Great !!! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:50:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593437</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593437</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:50:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This Movie Is Great !!! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:50:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>janet-conant</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 16, 2016 09:32 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Loved it in 1976, love it now. "I'm as mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore." I can't believe there are people who have never seen it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593436</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1593436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:50:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>