<![CDATA[Were they all children?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sybil

Steven_Titchenell — 10 years ago(July 27, 2015 04:24 PM)

Were all the alternate personalities really children?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/189986/were-they-all-childrenRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 20:39:52 GMTWed, 29 Apr 2026 06:01:04 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Were they all children? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:01:08 GMT]]>MalContentUSA — 9 years ago(June 06, 2016 10:44 PM)

I think the book gave Vicky's age as about 13 (although she seemed a rather mature 13!) down to Ruthie, one of the less-developed selves who was about 2 or 3the age Sybil would've started developing some sense of self and early memories.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1594021https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1594021Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:01:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Were they all children? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:01:07 GMT]]>janet-conant — 10 years ago(February 23, 2016 04:00 PM)

We don't know at what age the abuse and torture started but if it was at 3 or 4 then you can imagine why all the personalities were that age.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1594020https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1594020Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:01:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Were they all children? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:01:06 GMT]]>fiatlux-1 — 10 years ago(October 15, 2015 10:17 PM)

In her mind, all but Vicky seemed to be young.
I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus.
Didn't he discover America?
Penfold, shush.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1594019https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1594019Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:01:06 GMT