<![CDATA[Panning this film - really! Ridiculous review.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Close Encounters of the Third Kind

degrimstead-1 — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 05:30 AM)

Panning this film - really! Ridiculous review.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/190410/panning-this-film-really-ridiculous-reviewRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 08:25:58 GMTWed, 29 Apr 2026 06:57:33 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Panning this film - really! Ridiculous review. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:57:37 GMT]]>degrimstead-1 — 9 years ago(January 18, 2017 06:22 PM)

Oh, I hadn't thought of that. Hmm, can't imagine such a lousy review being helpful!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1597350https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1597350Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:57:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Panning this film - really! Ridiculous review. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:57:36 GMT]]>sensurert — 9 years ago(January 18, 2017 04:29 PM)

I think it goes by percentage of people finding it helpful.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1597349https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1597349Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:57:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Panning this film - really! Ridiculous review. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:57:35 GMT]]>degrimstead-1 — 9 years ago(November 23, 2016 06:06 AM)

Okay, that's wild. Between the time I posted that a few minutes ago and coming back just now, that review's been replaced by a glowing one. I guess the old saying's true, "ask and ye shall receive!" Boy I'm powerful. ;o)

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1597348https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1597348Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:57:35 GMT