<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Well worth a re-make]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sorcerer</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>SeanDx</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 10, 2016 04:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I generally dislike re-makes but would like to see this one done.<br />
In a good gritty style of course, something like Black Sea, no pretty-boy actors, no bimbos, no CGI, no shaky-camera.<br />
A decent movie for ageing actors, an antidote to The Expendables or Red, with a decent script, not played for laughs<br />
I would suggest you could pick a good crew from Liam Neeson, Ed Harris, Tim Blake Nelson, Mark Strong, John C. Reilly, Idris Elba, Jean Reno(also hinting at the link to the French original).<br />
The bridge scene would have to be included as that image from the poster is unbeatable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/191059/well-worth-a-re-make</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:42:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/191059.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Well worth a re-make on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SeanDx</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 30, 2016 03:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Like anything, some remakes are worth making, many are not.<br />
The 1992 film Last Of The Mohicans was the 5th or 6th telling of that story, we have had 3 decent films about the Bounty mutiny.<br />
Remakes don't always fall short, and Sorceror was (IMHO) good but flawed, the original was better but being in French and B&amp;W only film buffs would watch it now (outside French-speaking countries)<br />
Hence it is ripe for a decent remake.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1602282</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1602282</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Well worth a re-make on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Robbmonster</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 11, 2016 11:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">A remake of a remake. How post-modern.<br />
Because that's just what the world needs.<br />
Never defend crap with 'It's just a movie'<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1602281</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1602281</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Well worth a re-make on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prismark10</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 27, 2016 01:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Sorcerer is a remake of the French classic Wages of Fear.<br />
It's that man again!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1602280</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1602280</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Well worth a re-make on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Hawk4570</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 22, 2016 12:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You may not be aware that 'Socerer' is a remake of sorts, much like John Carpenter's 'The Thing'.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/10046268/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/10046268/</a><br />
If you haven't seen it, do yourself a favor &amp; give it a watch.<br />
While I enjoy both of the 1950s B/W originals, I prefer the newer versions.<br />
I've read Campbell's "Who goes There?" &amp; the Carpenter film follows it much more closely than the Hawks film. I haven't read Arnaud's novel yet, but I'll get to it one of these days.<br />
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distan"<br />
General John Sedgwick, battle of Spotsylvania.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1602279</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1602279</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:20:14 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>