<![CDATA[You know you're a geek when…]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Capricorn One

MrBark — 10 years ago(May 11, 2015 07:19 AM)

the biggest issue that you have with the film is that they used a Grumman Lunar Lander for landing on Mars. The aerodynamics alone [shakes head]
This fog is getting thicker!
And Leon's getting laaaaarrrrrger!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/191425/you-know-you-re-a-geek-whenRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 23:35:35 GMTWed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:23 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to You know you're a geek when… on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:26 GMT]]>CharlesP2009 — 9 years ago(July 26, 2016 01:29 AM)

Agreed. Obviously the filmmakers had access to real NASA hardware so I guess they did it for budgetary reasons. Still, how expensive could it have been to cobble together their own lander?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606050https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606050Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to You know you're a geek when… on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:25 GMT]]>iroquoisjoe — 9 years ago(April 29, 2016 05:54 AM)

Unless it had a heat shield cone like Viking 1 and 2.
Now
THAT'S
a geek!
Well played, sir!
On November 6, 2012 god blessed Americaagain.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606049https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606049Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to You know you're a geek when… on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:24 GMT]]>Pete8680 — 10 years ago(June 25, 2015 09:53 AM)

Unless it had a heat shield cone like Viking 1 and 2.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606048https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606048Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:24 GMT