<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[the biggest issue that you have with the film is that they used a Grumman Lunar Lander for landing on Mars. The aerodyna]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Capricorn One</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>MrBark</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 11, 2015 07:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">the biggest issue that you have with the film is that they used a Grumman Lunar Lander for landing on Mars. The aerodynamics alone [shakes head]<br />
This fog is getting thicker!<br />
And Leon's getting laaaaarrrrrger!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/191426/the-biggest-issue-that-you-have-with-the-film-is-that-they-used-a-grumman-lunar-lander-for-landing-on-mars-the-aerodyna</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 18:33:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/191426.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to the biggest issue that you have with the film is that they used a Grumman Lunar Lander for landing on Mars. The aerodyna on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CharlesP2009</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 26, 2016 01:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agreed.  Obviously the filmmakers had access to real NASA hardware so I guess they did it for budgetary reasons.  Still, how expensive could it have been to cobble together their own lander?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606054</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606054</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to the biggest issue that you have with the film is that they used a Grumman Lunar Lander for landing on Mars. The aerodyna on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>iroquoisjoe</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 29, 2016 05:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Unless it had a heat shield cone like Viking 1 and 2.<br />
Now<br />
THAT'S<br />
a geek!<br />
Well played, sir!<br />
On November 6, 2012 god blessed Americaagain.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606053</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606053</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to the biggest issue that you have with the film is that they used a Grumman Lunar Lander for landing on Mars. The aerodyna on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Pete8680</strong> — <em>10 years ago(June 25, 2015 09:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Unless it had a heat shield cone like Viking 1 and 2.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606052</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1606052</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:22:28 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>