<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The pacing in the movie just flows for a 2hr film. The intense intro of him getting caught was well done.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Midnight Express</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Worst-Movie-Ever</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 06, 2014 09:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The pacing in the movie just flows for a 2hr film. The intense intro of him getting caught was well done.<br />
Here's yer sign.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/191815/the-pacing-in-the-movie-just-flows-for-a-2hr-film-the-intense-intro-of-him-getting-caught-was-well-done</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 10:12:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/191815.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:33:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The pacing in the movie just flows for a 2hr film. The intense intro of him getting caught was well done. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:33:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>spookyrat1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 17, 2016 03:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That introduction is just so intensely realistic and fearfully compelling, even after repeated views. IMO, the best part of the film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1610330</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1610330</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:33:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>