<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I preferred…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Champ</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ziegfeldgirl27</strong> — <em>19 years ago(July 12, 2006 08:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">the original 1931 "The Champ".<br />
I dunno, sometimes I think less is more. The 1931 version was way more simple and tears me up every time. In my opinion, this version was a bit over-the-top sometimes. Of course, I realise the story was slightly modified.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/192709/i-preferred</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:03:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/192709.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:40:39 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I preferred… on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:40:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mustang2006</strong> — <em>16 years ago(May 25, 2009 09:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just read this post. I agree with it. Remake too over-the-top.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1617873</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1617873</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:40:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>