<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Spectacularly bad production]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Meteor</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>fnj2002</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 07, 2011 02:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This thing was the most spectacular waste of good-to-wonderful acting talent ever perpetrated.  When many of the actors underperform like this, who is at fault?  The director?  Even the outstanding actors who performed well (Sean Connery, Henry Fonda, Trevor Howard) couldn't come close to saving it.<br />
The special effects and miniatures were ridiculously amateurish even by the standards of a decade before.  Just compare the cheap plastic toys and unconvincing effects to the brilliance of<br />
2001: A Space Odyssey<br />
(1968),<br />
Close Encounters of the Third Kind<br />
(1977),<br />
Star Wars<br />
(1977), and<br />
Alien<br />
(1979).<br />
Heck, as well as being a 1,000 times better movie in general, the effects and miniatures of<br />
Forbidden Plant<br />
(1956) had the pants beat off this thing.<br />
Destination Moon<br />
(1950) was better than this.  This was closer to Buck Rogers from the 1930s.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/192902/spectacularly-bad-production</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 20:23:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/192902.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>oknar1977</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 17, 2015 08:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">it's like we watched two different movies. amateurish? what did you expect? lady macbeth? this is sci-fi pop corn movie, not broadway</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619531</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619531</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619530</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619530</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Raimar_Lunardi</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 14, 2013 12:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Bad is the image even the "dvd" have a quality poorer than my old VCR</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619529</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619529</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mike_cable</strong> — <em>12 years ago(August 15, 2013 02:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have to agree with all three posters on this thread.  This is one bad result of a production when on paper it had everything going for it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619528</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619528</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619527</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ghoolsby</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 28, 2015 03:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I noticed just how old it looks. I actually went to see this when it came out but it looks like something made 15 years before.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619526</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619526</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TVholic</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 26, 2015 09:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Don't presume to speak for everyone. Sure, we didn't duck and cover, but there were still plenty of us who couldn't be sure if someone in the Soviet Union wouldn't get an itchy trigger finger one day. You may have been a cynic, but we knew the Cold War was still on at the time. Just because it might be "someone else's fault" wouldn't have made us any less dead, especially those of us in the biggest cities in the US, who knew we were the prime targets.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619525</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619525</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>richard.fuller1</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 09, 2014 01:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Dr_Esqueleto: "You think the Cold War was irrelevant? This was made before the Gorbachev thaw. Nuclear holocaust was something very possible, not that it isn't anymore. Yes, in 2013 the Cold War seems a dull plot point but it was a reality then and its legacy is still far from irrelevant."<br />
Friend, when I watched Meteor for the first time in the early '80s, I didn't have an ever-lovin' clue how the cold war would be regarded over thirty years later.<br />
When the movie came out wasn't the 1950s. We didn't hide under our desks from nuclear bomb threats. We were the cynical generation after the anti-establishment late '60s and '70s.<br />
If a bomb was dropped on us, it was going to be someone else's fault.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619524</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619524</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Akzidenz_Grotesk</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 08, 2014 07:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You think the Cold War was irrelevant? This was made before the Gorbachev thaw. Nuclear holocaust was something very possible, not that it isn't anymore. Yes, in 2013 the Cold War seems a dull plot point but it was a reality then and its legacy is still far from irrelevant.<br />
Hell on Frisco Bay!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619523</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619523</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MettaQueensbridgeWarfare</strong> — <em>12 years ago(May 10, 2013 12:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If they cut even half of the slow moving shots of the missiles in space, they could've shaved like 15 mins off the film.  Talk about dragging stuff out.  LoL</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619522</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619522</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spectacularly bad production on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>richard.fuller1</strong> — <em>13 years ago(February 02, 2013 11:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The miniature effects didn't sink this. The misguided plot and over-emphasis on somethng irrelevant as the cold war lingering is what made it dull and uninteresting.<br />
That saddled with some idea that the music and then the models would really intensify things just made all that bickering completely unnecessary.<br />
And tossing in little things like the Siberian family, the Japanese family and the ski bunny as tho the viewers would now go OMG, then turn wide-eyed back to Landau, Malden and Keith arguing and Connery and Wood flirting and think what? Oh, how romantic!<br />
Definitely one odd puppy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619521</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1619521</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:08:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>