<![CDATA[Making a case: why the Orphans were the toughest gang]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Warriors

romefan123 — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 11:59 AM)

Nobody was sleazier, grittier, nor more homespun. These guys ruled, if it weren't for the cleverness of Swan, and the Molotov Cocktail, the Warriors were toast. Orphans had them surrounded, and in that beep would have pounded them into the pavement.
Notice the respect the leader garnered, with a snap of his fingers? Notice how they didn't have a youth worker? Notice how they put Mercy in her place?
Orphans were the best. Don't F with the Orphans!!
"Cobra Kai? Say itsay itNEVER DIES!" Karate Kid III

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/192994/making-a-case-why-the-orphans-were-the-toughest-gangRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:36:28 GMTWed, 29 Apr 2026 13:18:11 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Making a case: why the Orphans were the toughest gang on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:18:13 GMT]]>benntura — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 03:07 PM)

They were too low on the food chain, but they rumbled anyway.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1620106https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1620106Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:18:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Making a case: why the Orphans were the toughest gang on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:18:12 GMT]]>metrocub — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 03:44 PM)

Why weren't they on the gang network?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1620105https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1620105Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:18:12 GMT