<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This film&#x27;s scary as hell]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — When a Stranger Calls</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>alexis-jonke</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 16, 2016 07:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And it's a good one. And MILES above the crappy remake from 2006, but sadly that's the only one that most people have seen out of the two.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193143/this-film-s-scary-as-hell</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:44:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193143.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:42:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This film&#x27;s scary as hell on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:42:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>shred-com</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 24, 2016 01:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Really? I'm pretty sure WAY more people have seen the original. They probably don't post about it online, but this was a really popular film during the 80's and 90's and its sequel used to be on all the time. I know the remake did fairly well, but the original actually did better when it gets adjusted for inflation.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1621534</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1621534</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:42:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>