<![CDATA[And it's a good one. And MILES above the crappy remake from 2006, but sadly that's the only one that most people have se]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — When a Stranger Calls

alexis-jonke — 10 years ago(March 16, 2016 07:26 PM)

And it's a good one. And MILES above the crappy remake from 2006, but sadly that's the only one that most people have seen out of the two.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193144/and-it-s-a-good-one-and-miles-above-the-crappy-remake-from-2006-but-sadly-that-s-the-only-one-that-most-people-have-seRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 00:48:04 GMTWed, 29 Apr 2026 13:42:22 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to And it's a good one. And MILES above the crappy remake from 2006, but sadly that's the only one that most people have se on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:42:23 GMT]]>shred-com — 10 years ago(March 24, 2016 01:56 AM)

Really? I'm pretty sure WAY more people have seen the original. They probably don't post about it online, but this was a really popular film during the 80's and 90's and its sequel used to be on all the time. I know the remake did fairly well, but the original actually did better when it gets adjusted for inflation.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1621536https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1621536Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:42:23 GMT