<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[what&#x27;s this movie originally a porn flick?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Battle Beyond the Stars</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>SeaSerpent</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 07, 2016 07:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">it really looks like a pornographic version of Star Wars was original idea, but then they decided to make a real movie but you some of the props, costumes, and even kept a few porno movie lines.The starship has breast wtf</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193384/what-s-this-movie-originally-a-porn-flick</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 22:20:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193384.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:15:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to what&#x27;s this movie originally a porn flick? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:15:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Blueghost</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 03, 2017 02:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Porn films are shot on the cheap, so it's got that visual plainness, but otherwise no, it was not originally envisioned as an adult sex film.  It's just a poorly shot piece of junk.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623486</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623486</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:15:55 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>