<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[That ship had tits!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Battle Beyond the Stars</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>MRCAB</strong> — <em>18 years ago(September 03, 2007 02:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">that ship had tits!<br />
yeah I don't know what else to say <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":-p" alt="😛" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193457/that-ship-had-tits</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:27:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193457.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:46 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That ship had tits! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Profondorosso75</strong> — <em>14 years ago(February 20, 2012 02:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hmm, I thought it looked like a giant moose  or the head of a giant slug. Weird choice for a space ship to be sure. I always thought that was one of the weakest parts. in any scifi your tech has to be cool, and that ship was not cool, lol. speaking of the ship every time  I watch this movie I think of ways it could have really been much better. the character of "nell" instead of being a Flo from "alice" type wise-cracking type could have been a sultry voice who was kind of flirting with Shad and his new girlfriend could have been jealous. I think that would have been a more interesting dynamic.<br />
"everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623953</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623953</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That ship had tits! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>psdhart</strong> — <em>14 years ago(August 07, 2011 10:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Still it could have been "booby trapped"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623952</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623952</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That ship had tits! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lvcambot-2</strong> — <em>18 years ago(March 11, 2008 09:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The most Sci-Fi sexual scene I think was in the epic "Green Slime" film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623951</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623951</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That ship had tits! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>matwsussx</strong> — <em>18 years ago(January 27, 2008 08:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i agree. sybil danning's "costume", the dial-a-date machine, the flirting between richard thomas and the off-scene rape of richard thomas' sister. definitely more sexuall charged</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623950</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623950</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That ship had tits! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>LightningLad</strong> — <em>18 years ago(January 25, 2008 04:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah - noticed that tooin general, this film is definitely more sexually charged than Star Wars.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623949</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623949</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to That ship had tits! on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>savagesteve13</strong> — <em>18 years ago(January 06, 2008 05:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Even worse, it looked like a uterus &amp; vagina, complete with fallopian tube and ovary laser cannons!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623948</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1623948</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:23:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>