Horrible idea.

I'd love to see a remake with Pee Wee Herman as Mr. Lasky.
Cats are delicate dainty animals who suffer from a variety of ailments except insomnia.

I'd like to see this film remade. They could use the F/A-18's that took on the Jolly Rogers tail markings.
Considering the CGI capabilities of today, it could look great; provided they stayed with the original storyline and just enhanced the look of it.

This message has been deleted.

Yes Die Hard is a sequel. Scrap that.
Yes tthey should remake this film itz a great film but the special effects need to be updated.

Hollywood CGIs everything these days. Wouldn't be anywhere near the same film. It would be Battleship.

The Navy can't afford not to. Do you know how much they get paid by Hollywwod for this type of film?

No way. The Navy can't afford to fly the Blue Angels, no way they are going to help like they did with this movie. It's all real air footage. And the Tomcat is retired. So many reasons not to remake this cult classic.

Remakes have always been done.

Like I said; small shoes sailor..

NO, it was an attempted insult, not an observation.
My behavior was in telling a person who was listing sequels as remakes, to learn the difference. Something that is justified in stating.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

I sorry if you took it as an insult. It was just an observation of your behavior.

Wow, a pathetic insult from a 5 year old.
I'm impressed.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

Wow. You wear pretty small shoes sailor..!!!!!
You'd think the us navy, could affort buying proper size boots)

I like to think of the die hard 5 as a remake

This message has been deleted.

CGSailor is usually right (even if he is a skimmer). What gets gets annoying on this forum (as well as many others on the internet) is the seemingly unending quantity of of apparent know-it-alls who have no reason to know anything about some of the things they post because they have not been there and really have no idea what they are talking about. This very understandably aggravates those of us who have been there and know that some of their lofty-sounding pronouncements are total beep. In this regard, any critical comments he might have made about CRIMSON TIDE are almost surely more accurate than otherwise. Truly, you ought to read what I wrote about that travesty of celluloid.

This message has been deleted.

Take a look at the individuals to which I am coming off that way. as opposed to those in which I don't.
Trolls, and people posting absurdity and ignorance does bring out the rude in me. All others I do not.
Moghul here is a known troll throughout several boards.
If you post stupid, you're gonna get called on it.
If you ask questions, you might get answers.
And no.. that is not me being a know-it-all. If I don't know I don't answer up with stupidity. I only answer when I DO HAVE information.
If you don't look for ONLY the negativity, you will find there are a great many who enjoy my posts and information as well.
You want to focus only on the negative and define me by that alone that's YOUR problem.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

I was reading some of your posts on the Crimson Tide board and you came across there as you do here: as a rather unpleasant, grumpy know-it-all who finds it appealing to act smug and superior. I hope you aren't like that in real life, nor were that way with your fellow shipmates while in service.

No doubt trash, but you were calling them remakes when they weren't. that's the problem, not whether they were bad or not.
and what's the diff between rhal and rhal-1? Sockpuppet?
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

Sequels, Remakes its still trash

You know it's fully deserved don't even bother denying.
All anyone has to do is look at your posting history to see the crap you pull.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

This message has been deleted.