<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Final Countdown</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Hanz-Willhelm</strong> — <em>12 years ago(August 21, 2013 10:22 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then what? They'd run out of jet fuel, they'd have no high-tech, sophisticated parts for the Nimitz and for all of the aircraft so they couldn't have been at fighting mode for very long.<br />
How long would it take the U.S. to study and analyze the ship, plane, computers and electronics and try to catch up? With the technology of the day could they have even duplicated these technologies, the new metals in the jet engines and that make up the skin of the jets, all of the electronics that are so minaturized, the reactors on the Nimitz and so much more.<br />
What would have happened? Could the Nimitz have even stayed combat ready long enough to shorten the war? They probably couldn't have helped in Europe at all. The ship that is part of the fleet that re-stocks the carrier is now gone so they don't have replacements for any 1979 materials. Now Japan would have reacted differently with their attack being crushed and they may not have been as bold with their Pacific attacks with this new U.S. weapon. They don't know it is the only one and it is a short term weapon. How would Japan have reacted with the defeat against an almost invincible ship and planes?<br />
Lot's of questions. What do others think would happen? Are there any weapons/technology specialists who may guess as to how the U.S. in 1941 with 1941 technology could make use of this new technology? How long catch up and produce more of what the Nimitz has? How long could the Nimitz fight? How long of a jet fuel supply does the ship carry? How often do the jets need major maintenence?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193916/they-could-have-defeated-the-japanese-attack-on-pearl-harbor-and-they-could-have-been-effective-for-a-while-but-then-wha</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:05:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/193916.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:43:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Cairo-5</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 13, 2015 01:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The nuclear engineers who run the Nimitz's nuclear reactors<br />
Well thanks for the compliment but we guys who ran the Navy's nuclear reactors weren't given any diplomas or academic degrees for completing Navy Nuclear Power School.<br />
As for meeting with the Manhattan Project people and explaining things I guess I could have informed them that the bomb is going to make a really big<br />
BOOM<br />
but I don't expect Gen. Groves would have given me a plane ride to Los Alamos to deliver that earth shaking piece of information.<br />
BTW, what would Chester Nimitz have to do with anything? It's not as if the Navy would replace Husband E. Kimmel after achieving "a major victory for the US."</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">It's easier to be an individual than a god.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628717</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628717</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>brifitz1980</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 13, 2015 10:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Stopping the attack on Pearl Harbor would have been a major victory for the US.  All 8 battleships would have been combat ready on Dec 8, 1941 rather than 4 sunk and 4 others damaged.<br />
It's debatable how long the Nimitz could have been combat ready as fuel their aircraft needed wasn't readily available in those days.  Even if Nimitz just sailed into Pearl after averting the attack they could have had a huge impact.<br />
The nuclear engineers who run the Nimitz's nuclear reactors could just meet with the Manhattan Project scientists and explain to them how to do stuff that they wouldn't otherwise develop for several years.<br />
The commander and other history minded types could meet with leaders like Nimitz/MacArthur and tell them about Japanese strategy and future plans that we only know because of history.  "Attack here, don't bother with there, there is a fleet building up over in this area."<br />
Obviously after stopping Pearl Harbor the butterfly effect would start to take effect but if they could smash the Japanese supply lines/war machines in the early months of the war it would have been over much sooner.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628716</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628716</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>truther</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 19, 2014 01:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Nimitz would have won the war within a month.  There's absolutely no doubt in my mind about that.  All you'd need would be the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier itself, which is designed to go months (if not years) at sea; and then just a handful of aircraft.  You could cannibalize the machines to keep a few of their airworthy while at the same time dumbing-down the armaments.  An F-14 could be rigged up to drop a couple of 1941-era bombs, for example.  Nothing the Japanese had (and recall they didn't even have radar) would have been able to stop an armed F-14 flying at the speed of sound.  We would have known where their fleets were and we would have sunk their ships the minute the Nimitz steamed into range.  It's like being the only guy with a rifle in a battle fought by swordsmen.  Plus I don't know whether the Nimitz was carrying any nuclear warheads in the movie, but it would have been able to greatly speed up the US nuclear program.  We would have had the bomb by 1942.  So even if the Nazis refused to believe what was happening to the Japanese was real, and kept fighting, we would have nuked them.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628715</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628715</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>KylaDollz</strong> — <em>11 years ago(April 30, 2014 03:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Forgive my ignorance if this has been stated, as I don't have the desire to read every response to the original post. My opinion would be that you are looking at it all wrong, yes the advanced weapons would be nice for a short while, and while they would eventually run out, what they would have is MUCH more importantknowledge. As Sheen said in the movie, they would know 40 yrs worth of mistakes to avoid, they would know every turn every country would make. As long as they were careful to not drastically alter history, but simply counter move every move of their opponents with precisionit would have been a much more mild war.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628714</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628714</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CGSailor</strong> — <em>11 years ago(May 12, 2014 09:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">sailing around trying to find something to do and being spotted by aircraft from ENTERPRISE (CV-6) which was nearby on that day.<br />
Actually it would be more likely he would have come across Rear Admiral Newton's USS Lexington, that Halsey's Enterprise.<br />
Enterprise, while closer, was to the West of Oahu (returning from Wake), and after the attack, and searched to the south of Hawaii looking for the Japs.<br />
Lexington on the other hand was to the Northwest, en route to Midway. They turned around after the attack and searched to the North of Hawaii (which is where the Japs and USS Nimitz was).<br />
Lucky for us Lexington failed to locate the Japanese during their retreat.<br />
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628713</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628713</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kurt-2000</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 11, 2016 11:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Actually these were all branded as conspiracies, and the military discredits anyone that challenges the group decision making you're a victim of.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628712</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628712</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CGSailor</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 11, 2016 04:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">None  not one of the claims you make are a part of those "conspiracies proved true".<br />
And because some conspiracies are proved true does not mean all conspiracies are and will be proved in time.<br />
Additionally every one of those "proved true conspiracies" fall into one of several categories.</p>
<ol>
<li>normal criminal conspiracies. Not nutcase pseudo-science "grand conspiracies". The one about the Mafia for example</li>
<li>Not conspiracies at all. just programs that were classified at the time and later declassified after the need for secrecy was over. Manhattan Project and Operation Paperclip for example.</li>
<li>Still not proven and still bullsh!t. Its the same BS arguments made to "prove" their crap theories as have always been claimed by conspiracy sites. Infowars is a conspiracy site.<br />
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628711</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628711</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CGSailor</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 11, 2016 04:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If you quote infowars, you've already lost.<br />
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628710</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628710</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kurt-2000</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 11, 2016 03:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Your "Critics" are not professionals in the field.<br />
Your assumption and evasiveness tactic.<br />
armchair commando internet conspiracy nutjobs with zero understanding of wtf they're talking about. Like YOU.<br />
<a href="http://www.infowars.com/33-conspiracy-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-true-what-every-person-should-know/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.infowars.com/33-conspiracy-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-true-what-every-person-should-know/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628709</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628709</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CGSailor</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 10, 2016 11:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And againI don't agree with your characterization of the technology in question since critics point out that underwater technology was also developed under this program, but obviously we'll never agree on that.<br />
Your "Critics" are not professionals in the field. They are armchair commando internet conspiracy nutjobs with zero understanding of wtf they're talking about. Like YOU.<br />
The HAARP site is a landlocked facility in the middle of Alaska. It has no connection to any oceans, nor does any of it's research have anything to do with water. Those are fraking FACTS, you dumbass.<br />
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628708</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628708</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kurt-2000</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 10, 2016 10:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You posted your comment on the wrong thread, but I'll assume that was intentional since you're a comedian sailor.<br />
And againI don't agree with your characterization of the technology in question since critics point out that underwater technology was also developed under this program, but obviously we'll never agree on that.<br />
Again accounts of ship location based on reported directs in history is a subject we can agree on.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628707</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628707</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CGSailor</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 10, 2016 11:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh you finally agree that an Ionospheric research facility using high frequency radio transmissions into the upper atmosphere has nothing to do with sonar and hurting sea mammals.<br />
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628706</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628706</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kurt-2000</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 10, 2016 10:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">We found something we can agree on.<br />
lol</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628705</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628705</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mhansen-25806</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 26, 2016 02:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">OK.  Still, it would have been interesting if Yelland had to explain his presence.<br />
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it." - Yogi Berra</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628704</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628704</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CGSailor</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 26, 2016 01:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Owens position information was where the Japanese were in relation to Nimitz, not Hawaii. The Japanese aporoached Hawaii from the north.<br />
The Japanese being Northwest of Nimitz means that Nimitz is somewhere East and north of Hawaii.<br />
Enterprise was to the Southwest of Hawaii<br />
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628703</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628703</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mhansen-25806</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 26, 2016 07:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought Nimitz was to the west or southwest of Pearl since Commander Owens told Captain Yelland the Japanese were,<br />
"off the scope but an educated guess would be around about here.  They'd have to be here up around the Northwest sector."<br />
See 44:50 into the movie.  Captain Yelland then sent the E-2 there to search.<br />
But, maybe not.<br />
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it." - Yogi Berra</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628702</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628702</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CGSailor</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 23, 2016 09:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Enterprise was no where near the area that Nimitz was in.<br />
Nimitz was North of the Hawaiian chain, along the approach route of the Japanese fleet.<br />
Enterprise was to the Southwest, returning from Wake.<br />
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628701</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628701</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mhansen-25806</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 23, 2016 12:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Can you imagine Nimitz being spotted by search planes from Enterprise (CV-6) which was on the area.  Let's see Captain Yelland explain his presence to Admiral Halsey who was aboard "Big E."<br />
My original posting of this message was deleted for some reason.<br />
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it." - Yogi Berra</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628700</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628700</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628699</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628699</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Hanz-Willhelm</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 17, 2014 01:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I would assume that the complete truth would be the best approach. The truth that they existed formerly in 1979-80 and through some unknown phenomenon ended up there. They would have all the physical evidence on hand that the leaders in 1941 couldn't deny. The knowledge they could supply of historical events that were set to transpire for the next 4 years would be invaluable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628698</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628698</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628697</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628697</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Hanz-Willhelm</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 17, 2014 10:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wonder how long the Nimitz would act independently, doing whatever Yelland ordered verses reporting to the U.S. government at that time and then taking directives from President Roosevelt and the current Naval leaders? Would they have stayed hidden, doing what they thought best or would they have sailed to Pearl or the U.S. West Coast and reported their existence?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628696</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628696</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jpowell180</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 25, 2015 09:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The butter wouldn't melt, so we put it in the pie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628695</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628695</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Hanz-Willhelm</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 25, 2014 07:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Please explain?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628694</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1628694</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:44:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>