<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I&#x27;m trying to see if these issues are universal amongst all version or just the 2000 DVD release.  I&#x27;m only half way thr]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Heaven's Gate</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Outstandingness</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 23, 2016 12:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm trying to see if these issues are universal amongst all version or just the 2000 DVD release.  I'm only half way through the 3h39m movie and I think I'll stop because I think this has to be the worst version.  I was prepared for some flaws, but this version has so many.<br />
It appears it's in the wrong aspect ratio (?) - it doesn't fit the screen, there's about 3 inches of black on all sides of the movie; not just top and bottom, but also the sides<br />
very grainy.<br />
sound is bad, dialogue is lost in the mix<br />
colors tinted out:  it's so brown, it looks like it was developed in coffee.<br />
Please tell me the Criterion version at least looks better?  I'd consider finding it somehow if it was available even though Vilmos is clearly the highlight of this piece.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194035/i-m-trying-to-see-if-these-issues-are-universal-amongst-all-version-or-just-the-2000-dvd-release-i-m-only-half-way-thr</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 03:30:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194035.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:04:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m trying to see if these issues are universal amongst all version or just the 2000 DVD release.  I&#x27;m only half way thr on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:04:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>star-core</strong> — <em>4 years ago(January 15, 2022 07:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thankfully this can now be had on Blu-ray with much improved picture quality, although it still looks a bit muddy. The film was designed to look worn and aged, it doesn't quite translate to digital.<br />
What you said about the DVD having borders on all sides, that is a non-anamorphic release, basically intended for 4:3 TV's. If you watch it on an old square TV, it should just have borders at the top and bottom.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1629884</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1629884</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:04:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m trying to see if these issues are universal amongst all version or just the 2000 DVD release.  I&#x27;m only half way thr on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:04:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sleepwalking</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 07, 2016 07:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Criterion DVD is miles better looking. Cimino himself supervised the restoration/clean up of the print.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1629883</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1629883</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:04:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>