<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Heaven&#x27;s Gate is seriously flawed - miscasting, uneven pace etc.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Heaven's Gate</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Mickey77</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 15, 2015 04:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Heaven's Gate is seriously flawed - miscasting, uneven pace etc.<br />
But it does have a quality that is unique.<br />
A stronger producer would have ensured a more organised production while allowing Cimino to still achieve his vision.<br />
The FATAL ERROR was the withdrawing of the film after its initial opening in 1980. I think it would have found its audience in its original form over time. Initial reviews for the film were woeful - but that's not unique. When ROCKY first opened the reviews were luke-warm at best - but the film was allowed to find its audience over the first month - and it went on to be a smash. I'm not saying that this would have happened to Heavens Gate - but Cimino's pulling it for theatres after a week killed any hope of the film ever finding an audience. And postponing the worldwide release compounded the error.<br />
I saw it in 70mm on a giant screen in 1983 (after having seen the awful short version the year before). There is no comparison - original with all its flaws it still a thing of beauty - short version is an incoherent mess.<br />
"Thank God For Darwin"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194126/heaven-s-gate-is-seriously-flawed-miscasting-uneven-pace-etc</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 08:26:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194126.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:18:23 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Heaven&#x27;s Gate is seriously flawed - miscasting, uneven pace etc. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:18:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>col_rutherford</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 23, 2015 08:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Opinions about<br />
Heaven's Gate<br />
have become more favourable in the last few years.<br />
Heaven's Gate<br />
recently placed 98th in a BBC poll of critics' choices for the top 100 greatest American films.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630682</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630682</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:18:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>