<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Scanners</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>wolferian_shadow</strong> — <em>16 years ago(July 01, 2009 04:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i have ever seen and I loved the storyline.. I am disappointed to hear about the remake as I dont think it could do the original justice (but I am against remakes of any films!)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194168/i-dont-know-why-all-of-you-are-bagging-it-out-so-much-lacks-acting-aside-this-was-one-of-the-most-original-films-i-hav</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 07:49:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194168.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>maarck6</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 05, 2017 02:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, besides this movie being a product of its time, Scanners also had quite a number of sequels.  Scanners is a movie that probably couldn't be remade without an extensive updating, and the themes and plotlines of this movie have been endlessly recycled in other movies and television shows.  The acting is no better and no worse than most low-budget flicks of this time, filled with big names slumming and newbies on their way up.  Scanners came out at the right time, and it had the right cast, and I remember seeing it at the theatre and being blown away.  There was nothing like it at the theaters for my young self and so this is a movie that has stuck with me over the years.  Is it a good movie?  Who knows?  I liked/like it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630900</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630900</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>RaxR1991</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 23, 2012 01:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why should they try to make a remake great, or better than the original? They should just shoot the movie, fill it with gimicky CGI as always and it will be just fine  and right for the 12 year olds.<br />
Btw I just watched Scanners for the first time, and though I had seen the head exploding scene before, the movie is almost perfect, so there is no need for a cheap cash-in remake.<br />
My ratings:<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/user/ur20655940/ratings" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/user/ur20655940/ratings</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630899</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630899</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Odilwerk</strong> — <em>15 years ago(December 25, 2010 03:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love the film, but I think this is one of those films that could actually gain from a remake. If they do it well that is, and don't just churn out a tired old script simply for a cash in on cult status, as it could well turn out to be.<br />
If it was done well though I could imagine it being really good, and perhaps even a sequel!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630898</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630898</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630897</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630897</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sillyspaghetti</strong> — <em>15 years ago(May 17, 2010 01:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love the fim too!<br />
"Hey! Ladies! That was fun!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630896</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630896</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>RobBase086-1</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 29, 2010 02:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought the original version was very good and I loved it as well. Remakes never do very well in my honest opinion.<br />
Dedicated to USA UP ALL NIGHT and the fans of the show!<br />
<a href="http://www.deefilmroll.com/usa-uan/" rel="nofollow ugc">www.deefilmroll.com/usa-uan/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630895</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630895</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kevinseven</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 26, 2010 10:26 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Cronenberg's remake of The Fly in 1986 is better than the original. It's probably one of the best remakes ever.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630894</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630894</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i dont know why all of you are bagging it out so much?? lacks acting aside this was one of the most original films i hav on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630893</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630893</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:22:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>