<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I would have LOVED to see Meg Foster in the role of Kim.  Just saying.  :)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Scanners</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ButterflyAlias</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 19, 2015 06:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I would have LOVED to see Meg Foster in the role of Kim.  Just saying.  <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194177/i-would-have-loved-to-see-meg-foster-in-the-role-of-kim-just-saying</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 09:59:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194177.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:23:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I would have LOVED to see Meg Foster in the role of Kim.  Just saying.  :) on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:23:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>debtfull</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 29, 2017 12:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Kudos for not saying Meg Ryan.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630967</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1630967</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:23:30 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>