<![CDATA[Seen this film 2 times 1984 + 2009 still crap :(]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Scanners

karensastar73 — 16 years ago(May 31, 2009 03:37 PM)

Had some great parts the middle bit of the film was boring the end part was exciting I thought it was a rather tame horror film.
VideoVaganza!
..) .*)
(. (. . .`.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194208/seen-this-film-2-times-1984-2009-still-crapRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 05:16:04 GMTWed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Seen this film 2 times 1984 + 2009 still crap :( on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:09 GMT]]>Saintted — 10 years ago(January 01, 2016 08:46 PM)

Well, I read your post twice and
Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing it's idiot

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631232https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631232Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seen this film 2 times 1984 + 2009 still crap :( on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:08 GMT]]>TheInfected — 16 years ago(October 12, 2009 01:12 AM)

Yes, it tells me you cant remember the ending.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631231https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631231Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seen this film 2 times 1984 + 2009 still crap :( on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:07 GMT]]>cracked_machine — 16 years ago(June 22, 2009 03:32 AM)

I would watch it for the first 30 minutes. The money shot at the start is still quite intense viewing. But yeah it does drag a little after this. The fact that I cannot even remember the ending should tell you something! 😉

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631230https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631230Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seen this film 2 times 1984 + 2009 still crap :( on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:06 GMT]]>joonas2058932 — 16 years ago(June 11, 2009 04:58 AM)

IS THIS WORTH OF WATCHING.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631229https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631229Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:06 GMT