<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27;]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Scanners</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>NeverEndingMathEqn</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 06, 2009 06:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn't they show the woman's belly quivering a little bit?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194211/had-to-be-the-baby-scanner-somehow-the-thought-of-a-fetus-scanning-someone-from-the-womb-is-humorous-to-me-plus-didn</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 12:07:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194211.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:31 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631265</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631265</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Orso_Ipato</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 10, 2011 02:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Near the beginning when Revok makes the other car run into a wall and it exploded just by hitting it.<br />
Somehow it reminded me this Simpsons joke:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp6-IOVL__A" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp6-IOVL__A</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631264</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631264</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>projectcyclops</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 09, 2010 05:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">When Cameron interupts the doctor who's giving a medical exam to a patient and holds up the Ephemerol capsule, the doctor looks serious and tells his patient that he'll be right back and then adds, "read a magazine". As the patient looks around for one the camera follows his gaze and there are no magazines anywhere!<br />
Apart from that gag I can actually take the rest of the film quite seriously, despite how silly some it can seem nowadays.<br />
He left a note. He left a simple little note that said "I've gone out the window."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631263</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631263</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>trancerufus</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 08, 2010 10:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"See? I told you. No fireworks."<br />
BOOOM<br />
And they go flying through the window. I laughed out loud.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631262</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631262</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Saintted</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 01, 2016 08:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In 1980, most computers were "one step away from vacuum tubes". It wasn't simply a matter of trotting down to the Office Depot and carting the latest away in your backpack<br />
Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing it's idiot</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631261</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631261</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Marmadukebagelhole</strong> — <em>15 years ago(August 06, 2010 04:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jeez. Are people that easily amused by outdated technology? You guys need to get out more.<br />
I thought this scene where Revok tells<br />
Keller<br />
to kill<br />
Ruth<br />
was pretty funny.<br />
Keller "Really? But I thought you said you didn't"<br />
Revok  "Kill him. REALLY."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631260</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631260</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>randomlynx</strong> — <em>15 years ago(July 28, 2010 11:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">What about scanning the outdated computer as if it had a mind?  I mean seriously, the "super computer" was one step away from vacuum tubes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631259</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631259</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>psdhart</strong> — <em>15 years ago(May 17, 2010 05:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Actually it wqas filmed in Montreal (except the train subway: yorkdale subway station)<br />
But I get your point about Regents Park<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regent_Park" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regent_Park</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631258</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631258</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631257</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631257</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>psdhart</strong> — <em>15 years ago(May 16, 2010 01:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agreee the baby scanning scene was funny also at the beginning when Cameron helps himself to the customers food in the mall</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631256</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631256</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>imjustonetobe</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 23, 2009 05:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Haha.<br />
Personaly, I found the shaking caused by 'scanning' to be the funniest thing. BUT only if i'm thinking about the 'acting' that has a person do such a thing.<br />
Same goes with the acting of Mr Lack. If I look at it from the characters perspectiveit's understandabe. BUT as soon as I'm thinking in terms of acting actorssssit's highly hilarious.<br />
I'm suprised there isn't a youtube channel dedicated to people recreating such brilliant work <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=";)" alt="😉" /></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">On a side note: I always found the trainstation scenes to be funny also.<br />
For the first time (and second?) we watch the head of security meet with 'someone'. The camera angles and placement gives the intention of a secret meetingwith a secret someone. SO when the camera in the final 'trainstation' meeting pans to Revukkkk. I can't help but laughas if we didn't know!<br />
Bloody endearing it is <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631255</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631255</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631254</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631254</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to had to be the baby Scanner. Somehow the thought of a fetus scanning someone from the womb is humorous to me. Plus, didn&#x27; on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>alexross_82</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 26, 2009 09:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">not nearly as funny as the exploding telephone booth!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631253</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1631253</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:28:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>