<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[A solid feature from the previous century]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Scanners</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>AndreiPavlov</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 31, 2015 11:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's thought-provoking, it's got many twists, the effects are brilliant, the ending is sad and apocalyptic, and there are no unnecessary bed scenes so often stuffed into the serious movies just for the hell of it. And this one IS serious.<br />
All this easily make me forget about the minor flaws.<br />
Nu chto gliadite? Ne poluchali davno?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194243/a-solid-feature-from-the-previous-century</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:42:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194243.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:33:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>